Why most startup websites age badly (and how to design for three years, not three months)
Updated on
December 28, 2025
Reading time
6 minute read
Why most startup websites age badly (and how to design for three years, not three months)
⚡ Quick Answer
De flesta startup-webbplatser åldras dåligt eftersom de förlitar sig på snabba estetiska trender som snabbt känns föråldrade. För att designa för tre år eller mer bör man fokusera på tidlösa principer som stark typografi, verklig fotografi och återhållsamhet, samt bygga modulära system som kan uppdateras utan total redesign. Trendiga element bör användas försiktigt och separeras från kärnidentiteten.

Open your browser history from three years ago. Find a startup website you thought looked cutting-edge at the time. Chances are, it now looks dated—maybe even embarrassing. The gradient that seemed fresh feels tired. The illustration style that was everywhere now screams 2021. The layout that was innovative has become a cliché.
This is the startup website lifecycle: expensive redesign, brief period of looking current, gradual slide into obsolescence, another expensive redesign. It’s a treadmill most companies accept as inevitable.
It doesn’t have to be.
What makes websites age
Before we can design for longevity, we need to understand what makes sites feel dated. It’s rarely the technology—a well-built site from 2018 can still function perfectly. It’s aesthetics, and specifically, it’s reliance on aesthetic trends.
Trends are ideas that spread rapidly through a community. In web design, they propagate through design galleries, dribbble, awwwards, Twitter, and the general osmosis of looking at other people’s work. When you see a style emerging, adopting it signals that you’re current, that you’re part of the conversation.
But trends have a lifecycle. The early adoption phase feels fresh. The mainstream adoption phase feels current. The late adoption phase feels acceptable. And then suddenly, almost overnight, it feels dated. The shift happens because once a trend reaches saturation, it stops signaling currency and starts signaling the specific era when it peaked.
Neumorphism. Isometric illustrations. Noise textures on gradients. Memphis-style shapes. Blob backgrounds. Each of these will immediately evoke a specific moment in recent web design history. Adopting them tied websites to those moments.
The longevity paradox
Here’s the counterintuitive insight: the websites that age best are often the ones that never looked particularly trendy. They looked good, but they weren’t trying to look of-the-moment. They made choices based on timeless principles rather than current fashions.
Compare a site that used trendy gradients and illustrations with one that used high-quality photography and clean typography. Five years later, the second still looks professional. The first looks like a time capsule.
This creates a tension for startups. Looking current can help signal that you’re modern, innovative, moving fast. But the same choices that create that impression of modernity are the ones that will make you look dated in two years.
The resolution isn’t to ignore trends entirely—that can make you look out of touch. It’s to be selective about which trends to adopt and how deeply to commit to them.
Principles for longevity
Invest in fundamentals over flourishes. Typography, spacing, hierarchy, contrast—these are the bones of web design. They don’t go in and out of fashion. A site with excellent typographic choices, thoughtful whitespace, and clear visual hierarchy will look good in 2024, 2027, and 2030. A site that substitutes decorative elements for solid fundamentals will need those elements updated constantly.
Use real photography over stylized illustration. Illustration styles are trend-magnets. They’re what everyone notices first, which means they’re what everyone recognizes as dated first. Photography—especially high-quality, authentic photography—ages more gracefully. The photo might feel slightly of-its-era (clothing, styling, color grading), but it won’t feel as distinctly dated as last year’s illustration style.
Choose restraint over maximalism. When designers have many options, the temptation is to use them all. Animations, micro-interactions, layered elements, complex layouts. But each decorative choice is a potential aging point. The more restrained your design, the fewer elements there are to feel dated. This doesn’t mean boring—it means intentional, every element earning its place.
Let content carry the weight. A content-forward site ages better than a design-forward site. When the design is in service of the content, updates are simple—refresh the content, and the site feels current. When the design is the point, the whole structure needs updating when the design feels stale.
Build modular systems, not fixed layouts. A modular design system can evolve gracefully. You can update your color palette, adjust your typography scale, refresh your components—all without rebuilding from scratch. Fixed, bespoke layouts require full redesigns to update. Think of your design as a wardrobe, where pieces can be updated individually, not as a single outfit that must be replaced entirely.
The trends to avoid
Some categories of trends are more dangerous than others.
Gradient and color trends Are particularly perilous. The specific gradient styles—duotone, mesh gradients, dark mode with neon accents—are instantly recognizable and instantly datable. Solid colors or subtle gradients age better.
Illustration styles Date aggressively. The shift from flat design to outlined illustrations to abstract shapes to 3D rendered elements to AI-generated imagery happens in cycles of 18-24 months. If illustrations are central to your visual identity, they’ll need regular updating.
Animation trends Are similarly cyclical. Scroll-jacking, parallax, extreme stagger animations—these become clichés quickly. Subtle, purposeful motion ages better than flashy effects.
Layout extremes Tend to normalize. The asymmetrical, overlapping, boundary-breaking layouts that seem innovative become the new normal, then feel overdone. Traditional layouts, ironically, end up feeling timeless.
The case for occasional trends
Despite everything above, there are cases where embracing trends makes sense.
If your brand is about being cutting-edge—if newness is part of your value proposition—then looking current matters more than looking timeless. Better to refresh frequently than to look stale in a market where innovation is table stakes.
If you’re planning to redesign anyway, maybe because of a pivot, rebrand, or funding round, a trend-forward approach might make sense. You’re not expecting this design to last.
And some trends do become permanent changes rather than passing fashions. Mobile-first design was once a trend; now it’s a baseline. Dark mode was once a trend; now it’s an accessibility feature. Being early to genuine shifts is different from chasing short-term fashions.
What three-year thinking looks like
Design with the assumption that you won’t have budget for a major redesign for three years. Ask yourself: will this gradient feel fresh in 2027? Will this illustration style still work? Will this animation feel sophisticated or gimmicky?
Build your identity on elements that don’t date: a distinctive logo, a strong typographic voice, a clear and consistent approach to imagery. These become your brand’s constants, recognizable across time.
Treat trend-adjacent elements as seasonal updates rather than core identity. Your social media graphics can play with current aesthetics. Your campaign landing pages can experiment. But your main site should be the stable center.
The goal isn’t a website that looks like nothing else. It’s a website that looks like you—clearly, consistently, in a way that transcends the moment it was made.